Preventing Injuries in Football - Building a Multi-Component Injury Prevention Programme

Injury prevention remains one of the greatest challenges within modern football due to the substantial negative consequences associated with player injuries. Injuries incidence rates in professional male footballers ranges between 7.7-9.11 per 1000 hours of exposure, with muscle/tendon injuries the most prevalent (López-Valenciano et al., 2019, Jones et al., 2019, Ekstrand et al., 2013). Consequently, despite significant developments in sports science and medical support injury rates across football continue to remain high. For context, some teams can sustain up to 50 injuries throughout the course of the season with varying severity rates (Ekstrand et al., 2013). Hägglund et al. (2013) demonstrated that lower injury rates and greater player availability were associated with improved team performance and success in both domestic and European competitions. Additionally, injuries may also create considerable financial cost and prolonged rehabilitation demands for both clubs and athletes (Eliakim et al., 2020).

Subsequently, practitioners have increasingly sought to adopt evidence-based injury prevention strategies aimed at reducing injury incidence and minimising the wider impact of injuries within football environments. It is worth noting that it is not possible to eliminate all injuries, however it is possible to mitigate some of this risk. Literature has suggested the need to promote evidence-based injury prevention programmes (Kirkendall et al., 2010). Multi-component injury prevention programs have been shown to reduce injury rates in footballers by up to 40-50% (Obërtinca et al., 2023). However, it is important to recognise that football injuries are highly multifactorial where physical, physiological and environmental factors interact simultaneously to influence injury risk. This highlights the complexity of injury prevention within football environments and suggests that no single intervention alone is likely to completely prevent injuries.

One of the most widely researched injury prevention strategies within football is the implementation of structured warm-up programmes (Jeffreys, 2007). Historically, warm-ups within football primarily focused on preparing players physiologically for training and competition through low intensity running and static stretching. However, growing evidence has shifted modern practice toward more structured neuromuscular interventions targeting balance, coordination, movement mechanics and muscular activation. The FIFA 11+ programme is among the most recognised injury prevention warm-up protocols developed within football. FIFA 11+ consists of running exercises, strength-based movements, plyometric drills and balance exercises designed to improve neuromuscular control and reduce injury risk (Bizzini & Dvorak, 2015). Research has demonstrated positive effects regarding injury reduction, particularly for lower limb injuries. A systematic review by Thorborg et al. (2017) suggested that injury prevention warm-up programmes such as FIFA 11+ may significantly reduce overall injury incidence in footballers. Similarly, Sadigursky et al. (2017) reported a reduced risk of injury in footballers by up to 30% using the FIFA 11+ programme. The proposed mechanisms behind these reductions are associated with improvements in movement competency, landing mechanics, dynamic stability and neuromuscular control. Better control during deceleration, cutting and landing tasks may reduce excessive stress placed upon joints and soft tissues during football specific actions (Thorborg et al., 2017, Hewett et al., 2005). However, despite promising findings within the literature, the practical implementation of FIFA 11+ remains an important consideration. Although, this method appears effective in reducing injury risk, its practical success may ultimately depend on coaching quality, consistency of implementation and the ability of practitioners to adapt programmes appropriately to the demands of their environment. If coaches are unable to identify non-optimal movement patterns or provide appropriate technical cues, then how effective might this programme be in preventing injuries in footballers?

Strength training has become increasingly recognised as an essential component of injury prevention within football. Resistance training within football environments is often viewed primarily as a method of improving performance characteristics such as force production, tendon stiffness, neuromuscular control and movement efficiency (Suchomel et al., 2016). However, contemporary literature across sports injuries increasingly supports its role in improving tissue robustness and reducing injury risk (Chen et al., 2025). Football players are repeatedly exposed to high-force sprinting, deceleration and change-of-direction actions which place substantial stress upon athletes throughout a season. Thus, improving an athlete’s ability to tolerate these demands may represent an important component of injury reduction strategies whilst improving performance. Recent evidence has suggested that high-load strength training may positively influence both injury incidence and injury burden in soccer players. Durán-Custodio et al. (2025) demonstrated that a 12-week high-load strength training intervention reduced injury rates whilst simultaneously improving physical fitness characteristics in highly trained soccer players. Additionally, strength training interventions have consistently demonstrated positive effects on sprint and jump performance within professional soccer players (Nuñez et al., 2022).Balagué et al. (2024) critically examined the effectiveness of strength training within injury prevention programmes and suggested that poorly timed neuromuscular loading may negatively influence fatigue management and injury susceptibility. Additionally, the authors proposed avoiding high intensity strength sessions immediately prior to field-based training for more vulnerable athletes.

Literature has suggested that isolated muscle strengthening interventions may reduce injury risk amongst footballers, particularly regarding groin and hamstring related injuries. For example, Harøy et al. (2018) demonstrated significant reductions in groin problems following implementation of the Copenhagen Adduction exercise programme, while Hibbert et al. (2008) reported positive effects of eccentric strengthening interventions on hamstring injury reduction. Although isolated strengthening interventions have demonstrated positive effects regarding injury reduction, football injuries remain highly multifactorial. Consequently, relying upon single exercise interventions alone may oversimplify the complexity of injury prevention. Beato et al. (2020) proposed that multi-component programmes combining strength, plyometric and neuromuscular training may provide greater effectiveness for reducing non-contact injuries in football. Practically, this may involve integrating eccentric hamstring exercises, adductor strengthening and high-load compound movements throughout the training week. However, despite growing evidence supporting strength training within football, implementation challenges still exist within many football environments. Congested fixture schedules, limited recovery time and technical/tactical priorities may reduce opportunities for consistent strength-based interventions throughout the season. Additionally, balancing neuromuscular fatigue and physical adaptation remains a difficult challenge for practitioners attempting to simultaneously optimise performance and athlete availability.

High intensity exposures have become an increasingly important consideration within football injury prevention strategies. Hamstring injuries remain among the most common injuries in elite football, with many occurring during sprinting actions or periods of high-speed running (Ekstrand et al., 2022). Consequently, practitioners frequently monitor sprint exposure and high-speed running distances throughout training weeks to reduce soft tissue injury risk.

Historically, some football environments attempted to reduce sprint exposure during training due to concerns surrounding fatigue and muscle injury risk. However, more recent literature suggests that regular exposure to maximal or near-maximal sprinting may reduce injury likelihood through improved tissue adaptation and tolerance. Malone et al. (2018) demonstrated that chronic exposure to high-speed running may provide a protective effect against hamstring injury occurrence in elite footballers. Similarly, Edouard et al. (2022) suggested that regular maximal velocity exposure may reduce soft tissue injury risk through improved neuromuscular and musculotendinous adaptation. Insufficient exposure to maximal sprinting may leave athletes physically underprepared for the demands of match play, particularly during periods of fixture congestion or following return from injury. On the other hand, ensuring players are getting sufficient exposure to these high-intensity actions remains a challenge. Excessive loading may increase neuromuscular fatigue and soft tissue stress, particularly in periods of fixture congestion. Thus, practitioners may seek to expose players to weekly maximal velocity efforts in a controlled and progressive manner throughout the season Edouard et al., 2022). However, balancing the trade-off between promoting physical adaptation and fatigue management remains a consistent challenge.

Ultimately, injury prevention within football is unlikely to rely upon one single intervention alone. As previously mentioned, football injuries are highly multifactorial, meaning practitioners must consider a combination of strategies when attempting to reduce injury risk. Although evidence-based interventions such as FIFA 11+, strength training and high-speed running exposure have all demonstrated positive effects independently, their effectiveness may ultimately depend on how successfully they are integrated within the wider training environment.

This suggests that building an effective injury prevention programme within football may require practitioners to move beyond isolated interventions and instead adopt a more holistic and individualised approach to athlete preparation. Therefore, the most effective injury prevention strategies may not necessarily involve reducing exposure to physical demands but appropriately exposing athletes to the specific stresses they will ultimately encounter during competition.

References:

1.     Balagué, N., Hristovski, R., Pol, R., Borrallo, A., & García-Retortillo, S. (2024). Preventing or promoting muscle injuries? Strength training as a risk factor in professional football. Apunts Sports Medicine, 59(224), 100462–100462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apunsm.2024.100462

2.     Beato, M., Maroto-Izquierdo, S., Turner, A. N., & Bishop, C. (2020). Implementing Strength Training Strategies for Injury Prevention in Soccer: Scientific Rationale and Methodological Recommendations. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 16(3), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2020-0862

3.     Bizzini, M., & Dvorak, J. (2015). FIFA 11+: an effective programme to prevent football injuries in various player groups worldwide—a narrative review. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 49(9), 577–579. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2015-094765

4.     Chen, Z., Wang, J., Zhao, K., & He, G. (2025). Adherence to Strength Training and Lower Rates of Sports Injury in Contact Sports: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, 13(5). https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671251331134

5.     Durán-Custodio, R., Yanci, J., Raya-González, J., Beato, M., & Castillo, D. (2025). High-Load Strength Training Reduces Injury Incidence and Injury Burden and Improves Physical Fitness in Young Highly Trained Soccer Players. Sports Health a Multidisciplinary Approach. https://doi.org/10.1177/19417381251333417

6.     Edouard, P., Mendiguchia, J., Guex, K., Lahti, J., Prince, C., Samozino, P., & Morin, J.-B. (2022). Sprinting: a key piece of the hamstring injury risk management puzzle. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 57(1), bjsports-2022-105532. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2022-105532

7.     Ekstrand, J., Hägglund, M., Kristenson, K., Magnusson, H., & Waldén, M. (2013). Fewer ligament injuries but no preventive effect on muscle injuries and severe injuries: an 11-year follow-up of the UEFA Champions League injury study. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 47(12), 732–737. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2013-092394

8.     Eliakim, E., Morgulev, E., Lidor, R., & Meckel, Y. (2020). Estimation of injury costs: financial damage of English Premier League teams’ underachievement due to injuries. BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine, 6(1), e000675. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2019-000675

9.     Hägglund, M., Waldén, M., Magnusson, H., Kristenson, K., Bengtsson, H., & Ekstrand, J. (2013). Injuries affect team performance negatively in professional football: an 11-year follow-up of the UEFA Champions League injury study. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 47(12), 738–742. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2013-092215

10.  Harøy, J., Clarsen, B., Wiger, E. G., Øyen, M. G., Serner, A., Thorborg, K., Hölmich, P., Andersen, T. E., & Bahr, R. (2018). The Adductor Strengthening Programme prevents groin problems among male football players: a cluster-randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 53(3), 150–157. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2017-098937

11.  Hewett, T. E., Myer, G. D., Ford, K. R., Heidt, R. S., Colosimo, A. J., McLean, S. G., van den Bogert, A. J., Paterno, M. V., & Succop, P. (2005). Biomechanical Measures of Neuromuscular Control and Valgus Loading of the Knee Predict Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Risk in Female Athletes: a Prospective Study. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 33(4), 492–501.

12.  Hibbert, O., Cheong, K., Grant, A., Beers, A., & Moizumi, T. (2008). A Systematic Review of the Effectiveness of Eccentric Strength Training in the Prevention of Hamstring Muscle Strains in Otherwise Healthy Individuals. North American Journal of Sports Physical Therapy : NAJSPT, 3(2), 67. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2953322/

13.  Jeffreys, I. (2007, January). Warm-up revisited: the Ramp Method of Optimizing warm-ups. Professional Strength and conditioning. (6) 12-18. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280945961_Jeffreys_I_2007_Warm-up_revisited_The_ramp_method_of_optimizing_warm-ups_Professional_Strength_and_Conditioning_6_12-18

14.  Jones, A., Jones, G., Greig, N., Bower, P., Brown, J., Hind, K., & Francis, P. (2019). Epidemiology of injury in English Professional Football players: A cohort study. Physical Therapy in Sport, 35(1), 18–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ptsp.2018.10.011

15.  Kirkendall, D. T., Junge, A., & Dvorak, J. (2010). Prevention of Football Injuries. Asian Journal of Sports Medicine, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.5812/asjsm.34869

16.  López-Valenciano, A., Ruiz-Pérez, I., Garcia-Gómez, A., Vera-Garcia, F. J., De Ste Croix, M., Myer, G. D., & Ayala, F. (2019). Epidemiology of injuries in professional football: a systematic review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 54(12), bjsports-2018-099577. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2018-099577

17.  Malone, S., Owen, A., Mendes, B., Hughes, B., Collins, K., & Gabbett, T. J. (2018). High-speed running and sprinting as an injury risk factor in soccer: Can well-developed physical qualities reduce the risk? Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 21(3), 257–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2017.05.016

18.  Nuñez, J., Suarez-Arrones, L., de Hoyo, M., & Loturco, I. (2021). Strength training in professional soccer: effects on short-sprint and jump performance. International Journal of Sports Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1653-7350

19.  Obërtinca, R., Hoxha, I., Meha, R., Lama, A., Bimbashi, A., Kuqi, D., Shabani, B., Meyer, T., & Aus, K. (2023). Efficacy of Multi-Component Exercise-Based Injury Prevention Programs on Injury Risk Among Footballers of All Age Groups: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. 53(4), 837–848. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-022-01797-7

20.  Sadigursky, D., Braid, J. A., De Lira, D. N. L., Machado, B. A. B., Carneiro, R. J. F., & Colavolpe, P. O. (2017). The FIFA 11+ Injury Prevention Program for Soccer players: a Systematic Review. BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-017-0083-z

21.  Suchomel, T. J., Nimphius, S., & Stone, M. H. (2016). The importance of muscular strength in athletic performance. Sports Medicine, 46(10), 1419–1449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-016-0486-0

22.  Thorborg, K., Krommes, K. K., Esteve, E., Clausen, M. B., Bartels, E. M., & Rathleff, M. S. (2017). Effect of specific exercise-based football injury prevention programmes on the overall injury rate in football: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the FIFA 11 and 11+ programmes. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 51(7), 562–571. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2016-097066